Internet freedom is highest worldwide in Estonia and Iceland, according to the latest edition of a report from Freedom House titled “Freedom on the Net.”
Freedom House assessed 65 countries on their levels of internet and digital media freedom, based on a methodology developed with international experts. The survey, which covers 87 percent of the world’s internet users, tracks improvements and declines in government policies and practices each year.
It found that the highest degree of freedom of the internet can be found in Estonia and Iceland, with both countries’ scores unchanged from the previous survey conducted in 2016. The two countries were followed by Canada, Germany, Australia and the U.S., respectively.
For the third consecutive year, China was the world’s worst abuser of internet freedom, followed by Syria and Ethiopia. Iran, Cuba, Uzbekistan and Vietnam were the other countries to make up the bottom seven.
The “Freedom on the Net” survey is divided into three categories scored between 0-100 — obstacles to access, limits on content, and violations of user rights. The lower the score, the higher the internet freedom, making 0 the best and 100 the worst possible score; a combined score of less than 30 indicates freedom. Estonia was scored six points in 2016 and 2017.
According to the Freedom House report, Estonians have access to a wide range of content online, and very few resources are blocked or filtered by the government. Following court rulings on intermediary liability for third-party comments, some Estonian media outlets have modified their policies regarding anonymous commenting on their portals. There are no indications of any increase of restrictions on content or of self-censorship, and online debate is very active and open.
The report also says there are no indications of any increase of restrictions on content or of self-censorship, and online debate is very active and open. One of the very few content restrictions is found in the Gambling Act, which requires all domestic and foreign gambling sites to obtain a special license or face access restrictions. As of March 2017, the Estonian Tax and Customs Board (EMTA) had nearly 1,200 websites on its list of illegal online gambling sites that Estonian ISPs are required to block. The list of blocked sites is transparent and available to the public.
There have been some instances of content removal related to online communications, however according to the report, most of these cases involve civil court orders to remove inappropriate or off-topic reader comments from online news sites.
Freedom of speech and freedom of expression are protected by Estonia’s Constitution and by the country’s obligations as a member state of the European Union. Anonymity is unrestricted, and there have been extensive public discussions on anonymity and the respectful use of the internet.
Though online discussions are sometimes inflammatory, according to the report, there have been no physical attacks against bloggers or online journalists in Estonia.
Governments around the world manipulate social media
Governments around the world are dramatically increasing their efforts to manipulate information on social media, threatening the notion of the Internet as a liberating technology, according to Freedom on the Net 2017, the latest edition of the annual country-by-country assessment of online freedom, released today by Freedom House.
Online manipulation and disinformation tactics played an important role in elections in at least 18 countries over the past year, including the United States, damaging citizens’ ability to choose their leaders based on factual news and authentic debate. The online content contributed to a seventh consecutive year of overall decline in Internet freedom, along with a rise in disruptions to mobile Internet service and increases in physical and technical attacks on human rights defenders and independent media.
“The use of paid commentators and political bots to spread government propaganda was pioneered by China and Russia but has now gone global,” said Michael J. Abramowitz, president of Freedom House. “The effects of these rapidly spreading techniques on democracy and civic activism are potentially devastating.”
“Governments are now using social media to suppress dissent and advance an antidemocratic agenda,” said Sanja Kelly, director of the Freedom on the Net project. “Not only is this manipulation difficult to detect, it is more difficult to combat than other types of censorship, such as website blocking, because it’s dispersed and because of the sheer number of people and bots deployed to do it.”
“The fabrication of grassroots support for government policies on social media creates a closed loop in which the regime essentially endorses itself, leaving independent groups and ordinary citizens on the outside,” Kelly said.
Internet freedom around the world
Freedom on the Net 2017 assesses Internet freedom in 65 countries, accounting for 87 percent of Internet users worldwide. The report primarily focuses on developments that occurred between June 2016 and May 2017, although some more recent events are included as well.
Governments in a total of 30 countries deployed some form of manipulation to distort online information, up from 23 the previous year. Paid commentators, trolls, bots, false news sites, and propaganda outlets were among the techniques used by leaders to inflate their popular support and essentially endorse themselves.
In the Philippines, members of a “keyboard army” are tasked with amplifying the impression of widespread support of the government’s brutal crackdown on the drug trade. Meanwhile, in Turkey, reportedly 6,000 people have been enlisted by the ruling party to counter government opponents on social media.
Most governments targeted public opinion within their own borders, but others sought to expand their interests abroad—exemplified by a Russian disinformation campaign to influence the American election. Fake news and aggressive trolling of journalists both during and after the presidential election contributed to a score decline in the United States’ otherwise generally free environment.
Restricting global Internet freedom
Governments in at least 14 countries actually restricted Internet freedom in a bid to address content manipulation. Ukrainian authorities, for example, blocked Russia-based services, including the country’s most widely used social network and search engine, after Russian agents flooded social media with fabricated stories advancing the Kremlin’s narrative.
“When trying to combat online manipulation from abroad, it is important for countries not to overreach,” Kelly said. “The solution to manipulation and disinformation lies not in censoring websites but in teaching citizens how to detect fake news and commentary. Democracies should ensure that the source of political advertising online is at least as transparent online as it is offline.”
For the third consecutive year, China was the world’s worst abuser of Internet freedom, followed by Syria and Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, the government shut down mobile networks for nearly two months as part of a state of emergency declared in October 2016 amid large-scale antigovernment protests.
Less than one-quarter of the world’s Internet users reside in countries where the Internet is designated Free, meaning there are no major obstacles to access, onerous restrictions on content, or serious violations of user rights in the form of unchecked surveillance or unjust repercussions for legitimate speech.
Manipulation armies, by the numbers
Key global findings
Governments manipulated social media to undermine democracy:Governments in 30 countries of the 65 countries assessed attempted to control online discussions. The practice has become significantly more widespread and technically sophisticated over last few years.
State censors targeted mobile connectivity: An increasing number of governments have restricted mobile Internet service for political or security reasons. Half of all Internet shutdowns in the past year were specific to mobile connectivity, with most others affecting mobile and fixed-line service simultaneously. Most mobile shutdowns occurred in areas populated with ethnic or religious minorities such as Tibetan areas in China and Oromo areas in Ethiopia.
More governments restricted live video: As live video gained popularity with the emergence of platforms like Facebook Live, and Snapchat’s Live Stories Internet users faced restrictions or attacks for live streaming in at least nine countries, often to prevent streaming of antigovernment protests. Countries likes Belarus disrupted mobile connectivity to prevent livestreamed images from reaching mass audience.
Technical attacks against news outlets, opposition, and rights defenders increased: Cyberattacks against government critics were documented in 34 out of 65 countries. Many governments took additional steps to restrict encryption, leaving citizens further exposed.
New restrictions on VPNs: 14 countries now restrict tools used to circumvent censorship in some form and six countries introduced new restrictions, either legal bans or technical blocks on VPN websites or network traffic.
Physical attacks against netizens and online journalists expanded dramatically: The number of countries that featured physical reprisals for online speech increased by 50 percent over the past year—from 20 to 30 of the countries assessed. In eight countries, people were murdered for their online expression. In Jordan, a Christian cartoonist was murdered for mocking Islamist militants’ vision of heaven, while in Myanmar, a journalist was murdered after posting on Facebook notes that alleged corruption.
This article is sponsored by:
Show your customers that you care about their privacy! European Center for GDPR Certification is the “Consumer Trust Body” of the General Data Protection Regulation. Visit GDPRcertified.org to read about how to add “GDPR TRUST SEAL”™ to your website in order to gain more business and distance you from the not so serious businesses – It Pays Off!